<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for What&#039;s The (Share)Point?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://whatsthesharepoint.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://whatsthesharepoint.com</link>
	<description>Another resource for MS SharePoint information.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 22:04:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on jQuery &#8211; .SPServices &#8211; Google.OrgChart API Mashup &#8211; Part 5 by David Petersen</title>
		<link>http://whatsthesharepoint.com/2011/08/sitemap-part-5/comment-page-1/#comment-1644</link>
		<dc:creator>David Petersen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 22:04:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whatsthesharepoint.com/?p=251#comment-1644</guid>
		<description>Colin, great idea!  One of the great things about development is first imagining a idea and then figuring out how to make it a reality!  She has some pretty interesting things going on.  It gives me a few ideas.  Thanks for sharing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Colin, great idea!  One of the great things about development is first imagining a idea and then figuring out how to make it a reality!  She has some pretty interesting things going on.  It gives me a few ideas.  Thanks for sharing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dealing with the [Today] problem in SharePoint Calculated Fields by David Petersen</title>
		<link>http://whatsthesharepoint.com/2009/11/dealing-with-the-today-problem-in-sharepoint-calculated-fields/comment-page-1/#comment-1643</link>
		<dc:creator>David Petersen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 21:56:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whatsthesharepoint.com/?p=49#comment-1643</guid>
		<description>You will have to send me more than - &quot;It doesn&#039;t work&quot;, if you want me to help.  Thanks for reading!
-Dave</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You will have to send me more than &#8211; &#8220;It doesn&#8217;t work&#8221;, if you want me to help.  Thanks for reading!<br />
-Dave</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dealing with the [Today] problem in SharePoint Calculated Fields by Paavan Reddy</title>
		<link>http://whatsthesharepoint.com/2009/11/dealing-with-the-today-problem-in-sharepoint-calculated-fields/comment-page-1/#comment-1617</link>
		<dc:creator>Paavan Reddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 12:49:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whatsthesharepoint.com/?p=49#comment-1617</guid>
		<description>I have followed the steps mentioned as above..But I am getting &quot;Nan Min&quot;. Please advise me on this.

  Thanks for your reply..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have followed the steps mentioned as above..But I am getting &#8220;Nan Min&#8221;. Please advise me on this.</p>
<p>  Thanks for your reply..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on jQuery &#8211; .SPServices &#8211; Google.OrgChart API Mashup &#8211; Part 5 by Colin Dekker</title>
		<link>http://whatsthesharepoint.com/2011/08/sitemap-part-5/comment-page-1/#comment-1558</link>
		<dc:creator>Colin Dekker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2012 01:42:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whatsthesharepoint.com/?p=251#comment-1558</guid>
		<description>Might be cool to combine this with the User profile service Org data. SPServices in itself does not provide an easy (performant) way of getting the org. tree but Anita posted a nice &quot;workaround&quot; by using SPServices and Search to get all user and Department info. It should be easy to recursively parse the result to create a JSON treestructure, which can then be used to populate a google DataTable. 
If an org is to big, populate a department node of the chart on demand (maybe even build the department tree only first), if the google chart API supports that (?).

Anita&#039;s article on using SPServices and Search to get org data (relevant code is under the &quot;Activity of employees in own or a selectable department&quot; header):
http://www.itidea.nl/index.php/client-side-social-dashboard-with-sharepoint-2010-and-spservices/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Might be cool to combine this with the User profile service Org data. SPServices in itself does not provide an easy (performant) way of getting the org. tree but Anita posted a nice &#8220;workaround&#8221; by using SPServices and Search to get all user and Department info. It should be easy to recursively parse the result to create a JSON treestructure, which can then be used to populate a google DataTable.<br />
If an org is to big, populate a department node of the chart on demand (maybe even build the department tree only first), if the google chart API supports that (?).</p>
<p>Anita&#8217;s article on using SPServices and Search to get org data (relevant code is under the &#8220;Activity of employees in own or a selectable department&#8221; header):<br />
<a href="http://www.itidea.nl/index.php/client-side-social-dashboard-with-sharepoint-2010-and-spservices/" rel="nofollow">http://www.itidea.nl/index.php/client-side-social-dashboard-with-sharepoint-2010-and-spservices/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why does making a Lookup site column an indexed field break my CAML Query? by Alexey</title>
		<link>http://whatsthesharepoint.com/2009/08/why-does-making-a-lookup-site-column-an-indexed-field-break-my-caml-query/comment-page-1/#comment-1485</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 08:11:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whatsthesharepoint.com/?p=21#comment-1485</guid>
		<description>I have same problem... SP2010 SP1</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have same problem&#8230; SP2010 SP1</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Live Example of my Org Chart/Site Map Mashup by Chris Howell</title>
		<link>http://whatsthesharepoint.com/2011/12/live-example-of-my-org-chartsite-map-mashup/comment-page-1/#comment-1303</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Howell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 08:31:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whatsthesharepoint.com/?p=445#comment-1303</guid>
		<description>Hi,

Yes, it is working fine now. Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>Yes, it is working fine now. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Live Example of my Org Chart/Site Map Mashup by David Petersen</title>
		<link>http://whatsthesharepoint.com/2011/12/live-example-of-my-org-chartsite-map-mashup/comment-page-1/#comment-1299</link>
		<dc:creator>David Petersen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 22:55:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whatsthesharepoint.com/?p=445#comment-1299</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s strange.  I don&#039;t get it.  Have you tried it again, lately?  Try typing it in by hand.  Let me know how it goes.  

Thanks for checking though...

Dave</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s strange.  I don&#8217;t get it.  Have you tried it again, lately?  Try typing it in by hand.  Let me know how it goes.  </p>
<p>Thanks for checking though&#8230;</p>
<p>Dave</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Live Example of my Org Chart/Site Map Mashup by Chris Howell</title>
		<link>http://whatsthesharepoint.com/2011/12/live-example-of-my-org-chartsite-map-mashup/comment-page-1/#comment-1298</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Howell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 22:43:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whatsthesharepoint.com/?p=445#comment-1298</guid>
		<description>Hi David,

I&#039;m geting 403 Forbidden on the link.

Chris</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi David,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m geting 403 Forbidden on the link.</p>
<p>Chris</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Org Chart/ Site Map Mashup: Wrapping it all up! by What&#039;s The (Share)Point? &#187; Live Example of my Org Chart/Site Map Mashup</title>
		<link>http://whatsthesharepoint.com/2011/08/org-chart-site-map-mashup-wrapping-it-all-up/comment-page-1/#comment-1297</link>
		<dc:creator>What&#039;s The (Share)Point? &#187; Live Example of my Org Chart/Site Map Mashup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 16:15:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whatsthesharepoint.com/?p=398#comment-1297</guid>
		<description>[...] you have read my series on creating an Org Chart or Site Map using SharePoint lists, SPServices library, jQuery and the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] you have read my series on creating an Org Chart or Site Map using SharePoint lists, SPServices library, jQuery and the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dealing with corrupt WebConfigModification entries. by David Petersen</title>
		<link>http://whatsthesharepoint.com/2011/06/dealing-with-corrupt-webconfigmodification-entries/comment-page-1/#comment-1243</link>
		<dc:creator>David Petersen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 14:13:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whatsthesharepoint.com/?p=218#comment-1243</guid>
		<description>Good point!  Yes - I was doing this on a dev machine.  That environment tended to get get corrupted more than others, especially since it was a shared dev environment.  A couple of thoughts.   From my understanding, this will only clear the modifications that are in queue that have not been applied.  That would mean that the corrupt entry was in queue and not yet applied to the web.config.  I guess there is a chance that you could clear out any legitimate entries that might have been backed up because of the bogus entry but then you should have received an error from those entries also.  From what I can tell, this does not remove any web.config entries that have already been committed to the web.config.  Those entries have to be removed by code.

Thanks for your comment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point!  Yes &#8211; I was doing this on a dev machine.  That environment tended to get get corrupted more than others, especially since it was a shared dev environment.  A couple of thoughts.   From my understanding, this will only clear the modifications that are in queue that have not been applied.  That would mean that the corrupt entry was in queue and not yet applied to the web.config.  I guess there is a chance that you could clear out any legitimate entries that might have been backed up because of the bogus entry but then you should have received an error from those entries also.  From what I can tell, this does not remove any web.config entries that have already been committed to the web.config.  Those entries have to be removed by code.</p>
<p>Thanks for your comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

